Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volume 31 : Issue 1

Table of Contents

• The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading 
  Susan Hurley
  Page 1
• The relationship between conscious phenomena and physical reality in behaviour control: The need for simplicity through phenomenological clarity 
  Ralf-Peter Behrendt
  Page 22
• Mirroring cannot account for understanding action 
  Jeremy I. M. Carpendale and Charlie Lewis
  Page 23
• Can the shared circuits model (SCM) explain joint attention or perception of discrete emotions? 
  Bhismadev Chakrabarti and Simon Baron-Cohen
  Page 24
• The neural underpinnings of self and other and layer 2 of the shared circuits model 
  Linda Furey and Julian Paul Keenan
  Page 25
• Shared circuits in language and communication 
  Simon Garrod and Martin J. Pickering
  Page 26
• Does one size fit all? Hurley on shared circuits 
  Alvin I. Goldman
  Page 27
• Imitation as a conjunction 
  Cecilia Heyes
  Page 28
• Shared circuits, shared time, and interpersonal synchrony 
  Michael J. Hove
  Page 29
• Mesial frontal cortex and super mirror neurons 
  Marco Iacoboni
  Page 30
• Flexibility and development of mirroring mechanisms 
  Matthew R. Longo and Bennett I. Bertenthal
  Page 31
• Failure, instead of inhibition, should be monitored for the distinction of self/other and actual/possible actions 
  Takaki Makino
  Page 32
• What kind of neural coding and self does Hurley's shared circuit model presuppose? 
  Georg Northoff
  Page 33
• How do shared circuits develop? 
  Lindsay M. Oberman and Vilayanur S. Ramachandran
  Page 34
• More than control freaks: Evaluative and motivational functions of goals 
  Fabio Paglieri and Cristiano Castelfranchi
  Page 35
• Putting the subjective back into intersubjective: The importance of person-specific, distributed, neural representations in perception-action mechanisms 
  Stephanie D. Preston
  Page 36
• In search of a conceptual location to share cognition 
  Gün R. Semin and John T. Cacioppo
  Page 37
• Goals are not implied by actions, but inferred from actions and contexts 
  Iris van Rooij, Willem Haselager and Harold Bekkering
  Page 38
• Imitation, emulation, and the transmission of culture 
  Andrew Whiten
  Page 39
• Imitation and the effort of learning 
  Justin H. G. Williams
  Page 40
• Bootstrapping the mind 
  Julian Kiverstein and Andy Clark
  Page 41
• A study of the science of taste: On the origins and influence of the core ideas 
  Robert P. Erickson
  Page 59
• Insights from the colour category controversy 
  Tony Belpaeme
  Page 75
• Salty, bitter, sweet and sour survive unscathed 
  David A. Booth
  Page 76
• Criteria for basic tastes and other sensory primaries 
  James E. Cutting
  Page 77
• Basic tastes as cognitive concepts and taste coding as more than spatial 
  Patricia M. Di Lorenzo and Jen-Yung Chen
  Page 78
• The labeled line / basic taste versus across-fiber pattern debate: A red herring? 
  Edward Alan Fox
  Page 79
• Taste learning in rodents: Compounds and individual taste cues recognition 
  Milagros Gallo
  Page 80
• The nature of economical coding is determined by the unique properties of objects in the environment 
  Stephen Handel
  Page 81
• Basic tastes and unique hues 
  David R. Hilbert
  Page 82
• Mathematical techniques and the number of groups 
  Michael Lavine
  Page 83
• On the analysis of spatial neural codes in taste 
  Christian H. Lemon
  Page 84
• The complex facts of taste 
  A. W. Logue
  Page 85
• Language does provide support for basic tastes 
  Asifa Majid and Stephen C. Levinson
  Page 86
• And what about basic odors? 
  Veit Roessner, Aribert Rothenberger and Patricia Duchamp-Viret
  Page 87
• Basic tastes and basic emotions: Basic problems and perspectives for a nonbasic solution 
  David Sander
  Page 88
• The neural structure and organization of taste 
  Thomas R. Scott
  Page 89
• Synthesizing complex sensations from simple components 
  Richard M. Warren
  Page 90
• The pervasive core idea in taste is inadequate and misleading 
  Robert P. Erickson
  Page 91