Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volume 31 : Issue 4

Table of Contents

• Analogy as relational priming: A developmental and computational perspective on the origins of a complex cognitive skill 
  Robert Leech, Denis Mareschal and Richard P. Cooper
  Page 357
• Relational priming: Obligational nitpicking 
  Varol Akman
  Page 378
• A neural-symbolic perspective on analogy 
  Rafael V. Borges, Artur S. d'Avila Garcez and Luis C. Lamb
  Page 379
• The evolution of priming in cognitive competencies: To what extent is analogical reasoning adaptive? 
  Paul Bouissac
  Page 380
• Analogy as relational priming: The challenge of self-reflection 
  Andrea Cheshire, Linden J. Ball and Charlie N. Lewis
  Page 381
• Analogy is priming, but relations are not transformations 
  Fintan J. Costello
  Page 382
• Toward extending the relational priming model: Six questions 
  Eric Dietrich
  Page 383
• Developing structured representations 
  Leonidas A. A. Doumas and Lindsey E. Richland
  Page 384
• Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy 
  Zachary Estes and Lara L. Jones
  Page 385
• Relational priming is to analogy-making as one-ball juggling is to seven-ball juggling 
  Robert M. French
  Page 386
• Analogy and the brain: A new perspective on relational primacy 
  Usha Goswami
  Page 387
• Implicit analogy: New direct evidence and a challenge to the theory of memory 
  Anthony J. Greene
  Page 388
• Dynamic sets of potentially interchangeable connotations: A theory of mental objects 
  Alexandre Linhares
  Page 389
• Analogical inferences are central to analogy 
  Arthur B. Markman and Jeffrey P. Laux
  Page 390
• Neurocognitive process constraints on analogy: What changes to allow children to reason like adults? 
  Robert G. Morrison and Soohyun Cho
  Page 391
• Relational priming plays a supporting but not leading role in adult analogy-making 
  Alexander A. Petrov
  Page 392
• Abstract analogies not primed by relations learned as object transformations 
  Steven Phillips
  Page 393
• Relation priming, the lexical boost, and alignment in dialogue 
  Claudine N. Raffray, Martin J. Pickering and Holly P. Branigan
  Page 394
• Child versus adult analogy: The role of systematicity and abstraction in analogy models 
  Angela Schwering and Kai-Uwe Kühnberger
  Page 395
• Analogy is to priming as relations are to transformations 
  Vladimir M. Sloutsky
  Page 396
• Computational modeling of analogy: Destined ever to only be metaphor?¹ 
  Ann Speed
  Page 397
• Creativity or mental illness: Possible errors of relational priming in neural networks of the brain 
  James E. Swain and John D. Swain
  Page 398
• Computational complexity analysis can help, but first we need a theory 
  Todd Wareham, Iris van Rooij and Moritz Müller
  Page 399
• Development and evolution of cognition: One doth not fly into flying! 
  Edward A. Wasserman
  Page 400
• Growing cognition from recycled parts 
  Robert Leech, Denis Mareschal and Richard P. Cooper
  Page 401
• A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process 
  A. David Redish, Steve Jensen and Adam Johnson
  Page 415
• The origin of addictions by means of unnatural decision 
  Serge H. Ahmed
  Page 437
• Vulnerabilities to addiction must have their impact through the common currency of discounted reward¹ 
  George Ainslie
  Page 438
• Addiction, procrastination, and failure points in decision-making systems 
  Chrisoula Andreou
  Page 439
• Computing motivation: Incentive salience boosts of drug or appetite states 
  Kent C. Berridge, Jun Zhang and J. Wayne Aldridge
  Page 440
• Addiction science as a hedgehog and as a fox 
  Warren K. Bickel and Richard Yi
  Page 441
• Social influence and vulnerability 
  Joseph M. Boden
  Page 442
• Impulsivity, dual diagnosis, and the structure of motivated behavior in addiction 
  R. Andrew Chambers
  Page 443
• Gambling and decision-making: A dual process perspective 
  Kenny R. Coventry
  Page 444
• Different vulnerabilities for addiction may contribute to the same phenomena and some additional interactions 
  Andrew James Goudie, Matt Field and Jon Cole
  Page 445
• The biopsychosocial and complex systems approach as a unified framework for addiction 
  Mark D. Griffiths
  Page 446
• Neither necessary nor sufficient for addiction 
  Valerie Gray Hardcastle
  Page 447
• Human drug addiction is more than faulty decision-making 
  Carl L. Hart and Robert M. Krauss
  Page 448
• Are addictions biases and errors in the rational decision process? 
  Elias L. Khalil
  Page 449
• Role of affective associations in the planning and habit systems of decision-making related to addiction 
  Marc T. Kiviniemi and Rick A. Bevins
  Page 450
• Negative affects are parts of the addiction syndrome 
  Michel Le Moal
  Page 451
• Expanding the range of vulnerabilities to pathological gambling: A consideration of over-fast discounting processes 
  Carl W. Lejuez and Marc N. Potenza
  Page 452
• Addiction: More than innate rationality 
  Daniel H. Lende
  Page 453
• Bridging the gap between science and drug policy: From what and how to whom and when 
  Robert J. MacCoun
  Page 454
• Linking addictions to everyday habits and plans 
  David T. Neal and Wendy Wood
  Page 455
• The disunity of Pavlovian and instrumental values 
  Sean B. Ostlund and Bernard W. Balleine
  Page 456
• Timing models of reward learning and core addictive processes in the brain 
  Don Ross
  Page 457
• Cue fascination: A new vulnerability in drug addiction 
  John Sarnecki, Rebecca Traynor and Michael Clune
  Page 458
• E pluribus unum? A new take on addiction by Redish et al. 
  Thomas Stalnaker and Geoffrey Schoenbaum
  Page 459
• A mismatch with dual process models of addiction rooted in psychology 
  Reinout W. Wiers, Remco Havermans, Roland Deutsch and Alan W. Stacy
  Page 460
• Addiction as vulnerabilities in the decision process 
  A. David Redish, Steve Jensen and Adam Johnson
  Page 461