Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volume 30 : Issue 2

Table of Contents

• The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence 
  Rex E. Jung and Richard J. Haier
  Page 135
• Inherent limits on the identification of a neural basis for general intelligence 
  Clancy Blair
  Page 154
• Selecting between intelligent options 
  Roi Cohen Kadosh, Vincent Walsh and Avishai Henik
  Page 155
• A roadmap for integrating the brain with mind maps 
  Andreas Demetriou and Antigoni Mouyi
  Page 156
• P-FIT: A major contribution to theories of intelligence 
  Earl Hunt
  Page 158
• What about the neural basis of crystallized intelligence? 
  Kun Ho Lee, Yu Yong Choi and Jeremy R. Gray
  Page 159
• Integrative action in the fronto-parietal network: A cure for a scattered mind 
  Hamid Reza Naghavi and Lars Nyberg
  Page 161
• On images from correlations 
  Sarah Norgate and Ken Richardson
  Page 162
• Intelligence and reasoning are not one and the same 
  Ira A. Noveck and Jrme Prado
  Page 163
• Intelligence, hormones, sex, brain size, and biochemistry: It all needs to have equal causal standing before integration is possible 
  Helmuth Nyborg
  Page 164
• P-FIT and the neuroscience of intelligence: How well does P fit? 
  Vivek Prabhakaran and Bart Rypma
  Page 166
• Piece of mind; a full systems approach is required 
  Caroline Rae
  Page 167
• Can the Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory be extended to account for individual differences in skilled and expert performance in everyday life? 
  Roy W. Roring, Kiruthiga Nandagopal and K. Anders Ericsson
  Page 168
• Functional connectivity in the brain and human intelligence 
  Vincent J. Schmithorst
  Page 169
• Right answer to the wrong question: A reply to Jung and Haier 
  Robert J. Sternberg
  Page 170
• Plasticity in high-order cognition: Evidence of dissociation in aphasia 
  Rosemary Varley
  Page 171
• The neuronal basis of intelligence: A riddle, wrapped in a mystery? 
  Marko Wilke
  Page 172
• Overall intelligence and localized brain damage 
  Dahlia W. Zaidel
  Page 173
• Beautiful minds (i.e., brains) and the neural basis of intelligence 
  Richard J. Haier and Rex E. Jung
  Page 174
• Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action 
  H. Chris Dijkerman and Edward H. F. de Haan
  Page 189
• Tactile agnosia and tactile apraxia: Cross talk between the action and perception streams in the anterior intraparietal area 
  Ferdinand Binkofski, Kathrin Reetz and Annabelle Blangero
  Page 201
• Divide et impera? Towards integrated multisensory perception and action 
  Claudio Brozzoli, Alessandro Farn and Yves Rossetti
  Page 202
• Early development of body representations 
  Tamara Christie and Virginia Slaughter
  Page 203
• How many representations of the body? 
  Frdrique de Vignemont
  Page 204
• Disentangling functional from structural descriptions, and the coordinating role of attention 
  Knut Drewing and Werner X. Schneider
  Page 205
• Where are somatosensory representations stored and reactivated? 
  Katja Fiehler, Annerose Engel and Frank Rsler
  Page 206
• Considering general organizational principles for dorsal-ventral systems within an action framework 
  Elizabeth A. Franz
  Page 207
• Revisiting parallel and serial processing in the somatosensory system 
  Preston E. Garraghty
  Page 208
• Coming to grips with vision and touch 
  Melvyn A. Goodale and Jonathan S. Cant
  Page 209
• Close coordination between recognition and action: Really two separate streams? 
  Markus Graf
  Page 210
• Dissociating body image and body schema with rubber hands 
  Nicholas Paul Holmes and Charles Spence
  Page 211
• Skin stimulation, objects of perception, and the blind 
  Barry Hughes
  Page 212
• Do intention and exploration modulate the pathways to haptic object identification? 
  Roberta L. Klatzky and Susan J. Lederman
  Page 213
• A call to arms: Somatosensory perception and action 
  Gerry Leisman and Robert Melillo
  Page 214
• The perception-action interaction comes first 
  Ludovic Marin and Julien Lagarde
  Page 215
• Taking a conscious look at the body schema 
  Jonathan P. Maxwell, Richard S. W. Masters and John van der Kamp
  Page 216
• Central role of somatosensory processes in sexual arousal as identified by neuroimaging techniques 
  Harold Mouras
  Page 217
• Pathways of tactile-visual crossmodal interaction for perception 
  Norihiro Sadato, Satoru Nakashita and Daisuke N. Saito
  Page 218
• Multifaceted functional specialization of somatosensory information processing 
  K. Sathian, Simon Lacey, Gregory Gibson and Randall Stilla
  Page 219
• The multiple relations between vision and touch: Neonatal behavioral evidence and adult neuroimaging data 
  Arlette Streri and Coralie Sann
  Page 220
• Body image and body schema: The shared representation of body image and the role of dynamic body schema in perspective and imitation 
  Alessia Tessari and Anna M. Borghi
  Page 221
• Haptic perception is a dynamic system of cutaneous, proprioceptive, and motor components 
  David Travieso, M. Pilar Aivar and Antoni Gomila
  Page 222
• A hemispheric asymmetry in somatosensory processing 
  Giuseppe Vallar
  Page 223
• Somatosensory processing subserving perception and action: Dissociations, interactions, and integration 
  H. Chris Dijkerman and Edward H. F. de Haan
  Page 224